שיחת משתמש:Chidgk1

Hey. I checked your last edit in the article "global warming", and I saw you deleted Daily Mail, the second most common newspaper in the UK, as a source because it's "not a reliable source". Do you have anything to prove that, at least some kind of FactCheck? Nobody said that the things in the sources are correct, but we mentioned them because they direct the reader to the place where the scientists say "global warming" is allegedly natural. I, personaly, don't agree with them, but we have to be objektive and give the other side in the conflict a stage nither. So, meanwhile, I will aprove your edit, but I'm looking forward to seeing a PROVE that Daily Mail is "not a reliable source". THANKS. מו סיזלאק • הטברנה • לכו להתחסן, זה מציל חיים 13:54, 16 בינואר 2022 (IST)

,Hello The Turtle Ninja

.Good to see you taking an interest in this important subject and thanks for approving the edit

Perhaps the Daily Mail was reliable when the article text was written but in 2017 it was deemed unreliable at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources

By the way your English is very good but if you prefer to use Hebrew to reply at https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%97%D7%94:%D7%94%D7%AA%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%AA#Climate_denial_review feel free as Google Translate seems quite good for your language to English

Hoping to hear from you on the article talk page

I am also involved with https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_portal/climate_denial_review and I hope you might have time to contribute as obviously you can edit far better than we can on your Wikipedia

Chidgk1 - שיחה 14:15, 16 בינואר 2022 (IST)

Thanks for your interest! To supplement that (talk page watcher): there aren't any really any climate scientists left that deny the human impact of global warming (see https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966). The last IPCC now states the human impact is an established fact. The inaccuracies and climate denial of the Daily mail are well-established (see for instance London School of Economics, Carbon Brief, The UK media watchdog). We should not give a a false balance between psuedo-science and science. Femkemilene - שיחה 14:24, 16 בינואר 2022 (IST)

Hello to you two, Chidgk1 and Femkemilene. First of all, let me thank you for yours relentless work for scientific accuracy and fact checking. As I already wrote, I think exatcly like you two, but even if we disagree, we have to give to the other side a stage as well. BUT, as you already declerd, the other opinion must be leaning on facts. I just saw your link to the "black list" of unrelible scorces, so now I understand your position about the Daily Mail. I will see your addaitinal edit and I will approve them too. I will also look about the "Climate denial review" you linked me to, I'll be happy to help as much as I can. Thanks. מו סיזלאק • הטברנה • לכו להתחסן, זה מציל חיים 15:22, 16 בינואר 2022 (IST)